Top-Down Vs. Bottom-Up Chiplet Design
Third party chiplets are hitting the market as chiplet models evolve. Who’s calling the shots isn’t clear yet.
By Ann Mutschler, Semiconductor Engineering (November 26th, 2024)
Chiplets are gaining widespread attention across the semiconductor industry, but for this approach to really take off commercially it will require more standards, better modeling technologies and methodologies, and a hefty amount of investment and experimentation.
The case for chiplets is well understood. They can speed up time to market with consistent results, at whatever process node works best for a particular workload or application, and often with better yield than a large, monolithic SoC. But there is an underlying tug-of-war underway between large, vertically integrated players that want to tightly define the socket specifications for chiplets, and a broad swath of startups, systems companies, and government agencies pushing a top-down approach that allows chiplet developers to explore new and different options based on standardized interconnects.
To read the full article, click here
Related Chiplet
- High Performance Droplet
- Interconnect Chiplet
- 12nm EURYTION RFK1 - UCIe SP based Ka-Ku Band Chiplet Transceiver
- Bridglets
- Automotive AI Accelerator
Related News
- Cadence Unveils Arm-Based System Chiplet
- Cadence Rolls Out System Chiplet to Reorganize the SoC
- Blue Cheetah Tapes Out Its High-Performance Chiplet Interconnect IP on Samsung Foundry SF4X
- AMI Brings Firmware Expertise to Arm Total Design Ecosystem to Simplify and Accelerate Development for Arm-based Custom Chiplet Solutions
Latest News
- Cadence Launches Partner Ecosystem to Accelerate Chiplet Time to Market
- Ambiq and Bravechip Cut Smart Ring Costs by 85% with New Edge AI Chiplet
- TI accelerates the shift toward autonomous vehicles with expanded automotive portfolio
- Where co-packaged optics (CPO) technology stands in 2026
- Qualcomm Completes Acquisition of Alphawave Semi