Top-Down Vs. Bottom-Up Chiplet Design
Third party chiplets are hitting the market as chiplet models evolve. Who’s calling the shots isn’t clear yet.
By Ann Mutschler, Semiconductor Engineering (November 26th, 2024)
Chiplets are gaining widespread attention across the semiconductor industry, but for this approach to really take off commercially it will require more standards, better modeling technologies and methodologies, and a hefty amount of investment and experimentation.
The case for chiplets is well understood. They can speed up time to market with consistent results, at whatever process node works best for a particular workload or application, and often with better yield than a large, monolithic SoC. But there is an underlying tug-of-war underway between large, vertically integrated players that want to tightly define the socket specifications for chiplets, and a broad swath of startups, systems companies, and government agencies pushing a top-down approach that allows chiplet developers to explore new and different options based on standardized interconnects.
To read the full article, click here
Related Chiplet
- Interconnect Chiplet
- 12nm EURYTION RFK1 - UCIe SP based Ka-Ku Band Chiplet Transceiver
- Bridglets
- Automotive AI Accelerator
- Direct Chiplet Interface
Related News
- Outlook 2025: Embracing the chiplet journey
- Intel patents chiplet GPU design
- Cadence Unveils Arm-Based System Chiplet
- Cadence Rolls Out System Chiplet to Reorganize the SoC
Latest News
- AI Chips Shifting from Round to Rectangular
- AMI Introduces New Management Platform Arm Neoverse CSS Chiplet
- Imec inaugurates its Baden-Württemberg office, focused on advancements in automotive chiplet
- Eliyan Showcases Next-Generation Chiplet Interconnect and Memory Innovations at OCP Global Summit 2025
- Rebellions joins Arm Total Design to Drive Next-Gen AI Infrastructure Solutions